04/15/2004Maxwell Demon (2): I really did not care for the ending-I found the voices of the wo/men inauthentic. To me the payoff didn’t live up to potential suggested by the narrative in part 1.
04/15/2004Benny Maniacs (2): It looked pretty good there but left me exceedingly puzzled.
04/15/2004Ferucio P. Chhretan: Yeah, I guess I kinda dropped the ball. I started out Warner and finished out Filmation.
04/15/2004anonymous: Oh, and Disney, the brains were switched. I am not saying that brainless people like sports.
04/15/2004John Slocum (4): 2's? I don't understand. This seems a little less interesting than the first installment, but still well done. The gender joke isn't that well done or funny but, for me, is saved by the final panel. The concept of this scientist betting with a cat about the outcome of switching brains between a male and a female is funny. Also, the last panel explains some of the cat's previously inexplicable facial expressions which I found to be an interesting experience. 2's?
04/15/2004John Slocum: Nice 'Reveal,' Chhretan
04/15/2004Ewan Snow (4): I agree with Slocum!
04/15/2004Dylan Danko: Is that a stapler on the cat's tray?
04/15/2004Ewan Snow: yes
04/15/2004anonymous: I guess I'll let Snow field that question!
04/15/2004John Slocum: just look at panel 6 - that cat is very self-satisfied. Why? He's confident he's going to win the bet. Go back to the first installment - there is glee on the cat's face - he LOVES this, a true competitor. The more I think about it, the more I wish I had given 5 stars instead of 4.
04/15/2004Cabot (4):
04/23/2004scoop (2): I agree with Demon. By the way Demon you're not going to break my heart the way Cole broke Phoebe's on "Charmed" by luring her to the forces of darkeness with his demonic sweetness? I hope not.
05/19/2004TheBuyer (4):
07/21/2004TheBuyer: dude. you got hosed. this is good. All of you should take more 'Random Short' field trips.
