YOU: Slightly chubby blond who leaned forward to reveal cleavage on the 1/9 train. ME: looking down your shirt, masturbating furiously several hours later. Wanna talk? Call me 217-2316.
Date Written: June 1, 2004 Author:Will Disney Average Vote: 2.6667
Comments:
06/4/2004Will Disney: is this a 212 number?
06/4/2004anonymous: 718 actually
06/4/2004Ewan Snow (3): 718? Fuck Brooklyn. Three stars.
06/4/2004scoop (1): Manhattan is for posers.
06/4/2004anonymous: 1 star???
06/4/2004scoop: Yeah.
06/4/2004qualcomm (2): i'll give it this many.
06/4/2004anonymous: well, i thought this one was kinda funny! also very short.
06/4/2004Jimson S. Sorghum: Scoop: It's spelt poseurs.
06/4/2004anonymous: jimson, vote you coward!
06/4/2004scoop: I was going to try to say Manhattan is a place for puzzling questions, but that's not true. I just spelt it wrong. Anyway, I love Manhattanites, they have lots of big ideas about things. By the way Jimson, when are you returing to the thick, vaginal fold of acme's authorial ranks? Your unique perspective is missed.
06/4/2004Dylan Danko (3):
06/4/2004TheBuyer (3): musta had erotica or something written on her tits.
06/4/2004Jon Matza (4): I'm giving this a four with the intention of conveying to the author that I liked his short.
06/5/2004scoop: Matza: Would you have given this a four if Texxx were still an author, I wonder?
06/5/2004Jon Matza: I doubt it...but that presupposes a different intellectual atmosphere than currently exists. To me this influences how I read & how much I enjoy a short. Plus this short's lack of a narrative voice calling attention to itself via useless details, pointlessly inflated verbiage & incorrect usages would have suggested it wasn't Texxx. What about your cruel vote? To me one star means beyond not funny, i.e., intellectually/ aesthetically abhorrent in some way. Explain!
06/5/2004scoop: Not cruel, friend, just honest. If this were a guest short I probably would have given it another star. But I was offended by the idea that an author with an understanding of this site would post something that pandered so pathetically to the lowest common denominator. More than anything it's so wantonly obvious. It lacks any interesting detail work that might, and I emphasize might, rise this thing out of the chuckling frat boy morass.
06/5/2004Jon Matza: Yeah, you have a point. I might have slipped up here. FU Disney!
06/6/2004Mr. Pony:
06/6/2004qualcomm: are you saying someone's talking out of their anus, pony? i told you to stop thinking in pictures. now look at what's become of you!
06/6/2004Mr. Pony:
06/6/2004Mr. Pony:
06/6/2004Mr. Pony:
06/6/2004qualcomm: yeah i think in words, so i don't know what you mean.
06/6/2004scoop: I think in porno so I have a hard weiner.
06/6/2004Mr. Pony:
06/6/2004Mr. Pony:
06/6/2004qualcomm: how long must i stare at the pony hypno-beam before i understand?
06/6/2004scoop: until tuesday.
06/6/2004Mr. Pony:
06/6/2004Ferucio P. Chhretan: Poor Pony. Its so hard to write in Panty-mime. Nice emoticons...